Will mandatory pre-marital HIV tests help? - Instablogs
Will mandatory pre-marital HIV tests help?
Naresh Chauhan , Shimla: Feb 1 2008
Made Popular Feb 1 2008

Will mandatory pre-marital HIV tests help?
With about 33.2 million people worldwide suffering from HIV/AIDS, mandatory per-marital HIV testing remains a crucial component of AIDS prevention strategies.

Yes:

# In low awareness societies HIV pre-marital testing could help containing the disease.

# Increasing number of persons deliberately hiding their HIV status are putting their spouses and children at grave risk and have to face the brunt of society for no fault of theirs.

No:

# Making HIV pre-marital testing mandatory would not be socially acceptable and may defeat the very purpose for which such a law gets enacted.

# Mandatory per-marital HIV testing is an intrusion into the privacy of an individual that can be circumvented through fake certification to bypass such a law, if enacted.

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Agree
Making the HIV test mandatory a good move but why only before marriage?? Everybody should go for this test every year just like other medical tests. And huge penalty should be slapped on the people who believe in hiding their HIV status if positive.
1 Stars
Agree
Pooja
Shimla, India
A premarital HIV test must become an essential practice. After all, the cost of late intervention is 3.5 to 7.5 times the cost of prevention and/or early discovery of HIV positive status.
1 Stars
Agree
Rekha
Bangalore, India
A premarital HIV test is far better than matching horoscopes! At least it ensures that the couple are safe from the killer disease.
1 Stars
Agree
Interesting and much better comment Rekha :-)A premarital HIV test is far better than matching horoscopes! Great..
1 Stars
Disagree
Yash
Gwalior, India
Pre-marital HIV test?? wow..what a thought to divide the world in two sections - have HIVs and Haven't HIVs. isn't it? The great divide it will be and will destroy every difference existing in the world. You are either HIV or non-HIV. it doesn't mean you are rich, poor, Christian, Muslim, Jews, Hindus, Americans, Indians, Britishers... Great going...
1 Stars
Disagree
Toby
Liverpool, United Kingdom
yash is correct, Its bad idea to divide the world by making the test compulsory for all before marriage. You can't force anyone to check his HIV status. Just imagine a person is going for HIV test even when he hasn't touch a girl in his life. Isn't it so funny?
1 Stars
Agree
Marcela
London, United Kingdom
Hey Yash, apply some brain dude and use your creative thinking in constructive manner. Think.. the divide (about what you are talking about) will kill other differences. Isn't really good idea to stop the deadly spread of HIV and destroy other differences as well. Think over it
1 Stars
Disagree
In my opinion, mandatory HIV-test may help curbing HIV/AIDS spread, but only to a certain extent, as it’s a concept like a shattered rampart, where HIV virus may creep in easily. The basic reason why I don’t go in favor of the mandatory test is that it may serve as an restraint only if you are unmarried so far. However, once you get into espousal relation, there is no guarantee that your life partner won’t catch this virus, from somewhere and blow it inside you. Isn’t it? however, considering it as a panacea against HIV/AIDS spread would be just like hoping snowfall in the scorching summer!
0 Stars
Agree
Brajesh
Banglore, India
‘Yes, it should be made mandatory because what’s privacy for you may be death for me’. Though HIV status is a private matter, but privacy in marriage can be destructive. An individual’s right to privacy must be respected but not at the cost of a human life. Therefore, I think it is an excellent idea to make pre-marital HIV testing compulsory.
0 Stars
Agree
Neha
Gandhinagar, India
As we know that the bomb of AIDS has started ticking in India, there is a firm need to put checks on it before it goes beyond control and pre-marital HIV test is just a stepping stone and lot more remains yet to be done in this direction. I am just waiting this law to be implemented in the whole India.
0 Stars
Agree
Prasad
Howrah, India
Though I support the idea yet, it’s just half solution, not even half, I must say. Yes, because this will decide the HIV status before marriage only. however, does it mean a guarantee that the infection cannot happen after marriage????
0 Stars
Disagree
Vinit
Mangalore, India
@ rekha
Can some body tell me here that what it will do after all??? In India where more than half of the population is illiterate and where there are lack of health facility, how long will it take, I wonder, for Govt. to provide these facilities at every nook and corner of the nation. Secondly, for AIDS there is only one potential weapon and that is awareness, until and unless people will not know what AIDS is and what are its results, it’s a futile exercise to do anything or that genre.
0 Stars
Disagree
Will premarital HIV testing work? Is this not an invasion to privacy? If one of the partners is found to contain HIV, what’s the next move?

What about people who engage in promiscuous sexual exercise out of marriage? Many are still engaging in it for fun or simply as practice relationship. What can we do about them?

Strengthening education campaign against HIV is better rather than screening those who has it. It is halfway to the solution but its effectiveness has yet to be tested.
0 Stars
Disagree
Prabhunarayan
Pondicherry, India
You all on the other side did not tell me about the privacy. Will this be taken in to consideration??? Will both parties in the pre marital HIV test stick to the fundamental human right for privacy?? Well I doubt, it won’t be intact once disclosed.
0 Stars
Disagree
Leon
Manchester, United Kingdom
Before arguing, do you people know this?

The commonly used test for detecting the virus is ELISA and it only detects antibodies. Here what I mean is up to three months after infection the test is not able to pick up antibodies. And the implication this would be – a person who is HIV positive will show a negative result despite being positive. Now you can imagine the scenario. And after the nod form doctors the couple gets married, and the results are catastrophic. The woman gets pregnant and a test is conducted… She tests positive, if done in time, child can be protected, otherwise you know the result. Therefore, who is to blame for spreading the infection? All that the pre-marital test will do is give a false sense of security to both the state and the couple.
0 Stars
Disagree
Gagandeep
Shimla, India
In theory they should but I would like to oppose them, at least in India, for cultural and social considerations. I’m afraid that weaker sex would be forced into such tests while males would sail through without any. The onus would fall on bride to prove she’s not infected and males would enjoy yet another way to assert their supremacy in an already tilted society.

The situation would be more favorable if these are either legally enforced - for both the sexes that is. Or if two parties go in voluntarily without any compulsion on either side.Otherwise I’m afraid this would just become yet another reason for rejecting a bride.
The costs involved in intervention may be significantly more but the social stigma that’ll result from failure is a point worth giving careful consideration to.
0 Stars
Disagree
Jennafer
San Francisco, United States
let me tell you one thing ppl… there are more than 30 states in the US that considered HIV pre-marital testing and rejected the idea. And here it will work, to be very frank, I am doubtful. Lastly, as a citizen of this country and a woman, the last thing I want is the government in my bedroom- if today they have the right to legislate on this issue, then who will to stop them from deciding whom we should have sex with and when.
0 Stars
Agree
Cam
Brisbane, Australia
those who are in favor of privacy and those who are against the view that the premarital tests will not help should rather debate on “Which is a greater right: the right to live or the right to privacy”? and of course, the former have more wait than latter. Human life is precious and privacy doesn’t mean destroying many other lives.
0 Stars
Agree
Tsuyoshi
Tokyo, Japan
in third world countries like India where you can buy any kind of certificate, from an MBBS degree to that of fake stamp papers, there to get the certificate of HIV negative is not impossible. This legislation of premarital tests is no means blocking yet another racket of issuing false certificates from not taking a stronghold.
0 Stars
Agree
Mariam
Lahore, Pakistan
Arguing against pre-marital HIV testing is arguing against cure. This is an argument against prevention. It 100% legitimate on the part of a spouse to know the HIV status going of his her partner. While searching for prospective grooms/brides people enquire about everything, including job, income, family background, convent, non-convent education, English-speaking skills, complexion, and height and so on. So, why not include HIV status in this list?
0 Stars
Agree
Sumit
Agra, India
Yea rekha you are right but I would go little further. So before marriage we need to match the HIV Kundli and here doctor plays the role of astrologers.
0 Stars
Disagree
Jason
Wellington, New Zealand
hey! How about those who get married after two children????????
0 Stars
Agree
Ayushi
Calicut, India
Do you people have any idea why AIDS patients always try to hide their disease when it doesn't happen in the case of other disease. It happens only because of we people means the society. We just start boycotting AIDS patients like hell. Everyone knows that AIDS can't be spread with eating, living together or touching anyone. Still, there is mania about the disease that forces AIDS patient to hide the disease. There is need to create awareness among common people and the matter will be solved in no time. The problem is in our mind and if we solve it there will be no need to make pre or post marital HIV test compulsory.
0 Stars
Agree
Kezia
Liverpool, United Kingdom
completely agrred with Maynard..intelligent comment. awareness is better than screening those who has it.
0 Stars
Agree
Sumit
Agra, India
@ neha.. there is nothing like AIDS bomb ticking in India. this is all propaganda of several money making NGOs, fake research centers and civil servants just to fill their pockets. On paper India has been declared AIDS capital but this not the reality but a simple false reporting.
0 Stars
Agree
Sean
New York City, United States
No argument please. AIDS is a dangerous disease, it will kill you, so go to nearby health clinic for HIV test as soon as possible and use protection every time you enjoy sex with your partner. You can enjoy unprotected sex only when your partner also believes in going for such test without hesitation. Sex with one other than your partner is no-no, believe in abstinence but if yes then use protection always and be happy all the time.
0 Stars
Agree
Chintan
Ambala, India
Comments from individuals, who have no idea about AIDS, should not be accepted here. In fact this is not a matter of debate and the NO section should be deleted immediately.
0 Stars
Agree
Ankita
Thane, India
make the test mandatory and the world will experience another world war between HIV positive people and HIV negative people - the war of survival.
0 Stars
Agree
Stephanie
New York, United States
Yes, It should be made mandatory without thinking a minute more. people who are opposing have no idea how dangerous the disease is. I know because I got infected HIV from my husband who was HIV patient and didn't tell anyone. My two teenager children are also HIV positive.
1 Stars
Agree
Yash
Gwalior, India
Wuill help in rural India for sure. Many men working in big cities as daily wage laborers will find it hard to take for granted their wives.
Add your Comment